On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:29:10 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The issue frankly is not tracker features. The issue is who is going > to maintain it, doing pruning and triage as necessary. No tracker > looks after itself. If you provide a reasonable interface to management (which we don't have now) you will get people to help. I can do pruning, triage and follow up so can a *lot* of other people that aren't C hackers. > that these things have changed. (Perhaps Alvaro has forgotten those > discussions ;-) ) > > (And yes, Trac sucks) You do realize that they *all* suck right? I have never seen *one* system that I have said, "ooh ooh can I have my ice cream now, I have already had my cake." Trac is the only one that I have found that is anywhere near reasonable in its management of simplicity and features. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
