On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of > > DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual? > > It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users > probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if > they go that way. > > Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI > put somewhere else or stuck into a <note> or something. From what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2. http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/ I think it can safely be removed in entirety from our manuals. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
