Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > > Lastly, how is this sustainable? I don't see anything that is reducing > > Bruce's workload. (for example) > > The only think that will ever reduce Bruce's workload is him trusting > that things aren't getting overlooked. The value to the work Bruce does > is that he really doesn't let anything slip through the cracks. One way > we can do that is by having a tracker/wiki which is an easy place for > Bruce to see that: > "Hey, this is/was looked after. I don't have to worry about this > <thing>, I can delete it (and the followups to it) from my huge list > of even more things to look at without expending lots of time > re-reading the whole thread to make sure it didn't just die out"
Yes, the sooner someone applies or rejects a patch or idea the quicker I can remove it from my watch list and the fewer items I have to watch. Also, let me add the wiki does not have items that need discussion/feedback for this commit-fest. Is that going to be added someday? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
