Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:15:08 -0400 > Aidan Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> > Well, only if you want to "pull" the last status (i.e. someone else, > > not you may have updated it, and you haven't set yourself to be > > notified on changes). But again, since it's by email, you already > > have it all in your inbox, right? > > Do I? What if I am only using USENET to interfact? The NNTP interface is so unreliable that I doubt this is a problem in practice. > What if I just purged my mailbox because I get over 4500 messages a > month from these lists? You said it best yesterday: "tough". That said, in the Majordomo interface there is an option to send you a message from its archives. Or you can get the mbox from the archives. > > > * If I go to the wiki page again and click on the patch is it > > > going to take me right back to the archive page? > > > > Only if the wiki/tracker *hasn't* been updated. > > How do I know? You go check. > One interface should be the goal. The goal is making sure no patches are lost. I don't know why you feel so strongly about this topic. Are you a frequent patch reviewer? Not meant to bash you. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
