On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:34 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If you have something to add, please do so at some time, but if you > > are not interested in using a tracker anyway, just don't use it and > > ignore this thread. > > Hmm, well, I can hardly see how anyone could object to a tracker that > they didn't have to use --- that is, one that hadn't been declared to > be the new center of our development process. The push-back that > you're seeing is because just about every proposal for such a tracker > has included somewhere along the line the notion that the email lists > will stop being the primary reference. My suggestion wasn't that in the least. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
