On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Dickson dos Santos Guedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Brendan Jurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was going to try this patch out, but it would not apply. Seems that > > where the patch should have &, it has & instead. Has this somehow > > been HTML entity-ified? > > You are right, I don't now why this occurs. I'm sending it now > gziped, You may test it again. >
Hi Dickson, I actually already corrected the '&'s manually and tested your patch like that. It's nice -- I think this is a very worthwhile addition to \dt+ I note that your last email only went to -hackers; you might want to send the updated version of your patch to -patches as well. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
