Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> We should probably try to limit the focus of fests to consider only > >> actual patches, with design discussions handled "live" during normal > >> development, the way they've always been in the past. > > > We have discouraged design discussions during feature freeze and beta --- > > do we want to change that? > > No, changing that wasn't what I meant to suggest. My point here is that > we'd dropped a number of big mushy discussions into the queue with the > idea that they'd be re-opened during commit fest, but new discussion > did not happen to any useful extent. Conclusion: don't bother putting > anything less concrete than a patch on the fest queue.
So when/how do those discussions get resolved? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
