Dawid Kuroczko escribió: > I thought the patch would be trivial, sent it to -patches. Then, later > on I thought that perhaps it should be discussed on the -hackers > nonetheless, so I have written there also: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00147.php > then the patch got rejected, if I understand correctly.
The problem is that the patch was initially trivial, but it turned into a much larger redesign of command handling. I think that's a great turnout for a submission. > Don't forget to update developer FAQ as well. :) Agreed -- the FAQs and other documents do not cover the processes we're currently following. Mind you, the processes are quite young. (More reason to have them better documented I guess.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
