Aidan Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080417 20:11]:
>> Ouch, that's a real good point. Maybe a certain amount of platform
>> dependence is inevitable.
> I don't get it. If they are used as typedefs *anywhere* in the PG
> source, they're needed in the typedef list.
Right, but if the only use is inside #ifdef __BRAND_X_PLATFORM__,
the only way for the proposed toolchain to extract that usage is
if someone runs it on BRAND_X_PLATFORM.
Of course, for seldom-used platforms maybe we don't care that much.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
