Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While looking over the statistics-for-functions patch > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-03/msg00300.php), I > came back to a thought I've had before - why do we keep one function > per column for pgstat functions, instead of using a set returning > function? Is there some actual reason for this, or is it just legacy > from a time when it was (much) harder to write SRFs?
I think it's so that you can build your own stats views instead of being compelled to select the data someone thought was good for you. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers