Re: [HACKERS] pgstat SRF?

[Decibel!]

On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

While looking over the statistics-for-functions patch
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-03/msg00300.php), I
came back to a thought I've had before - why do we keep one function
per column for pgstat functions, instead of using a set returning
function? Is there some actual reason for this, or is it just legacy
from a time when it was (much) harder to write SRFs?


least new views added based on SRFs instead....

If there's no actual reason, I think it would be a good idea to make at

+1. I could probably use this for pgstats at some point.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature