Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:47:02AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Uh, sorry, got that explained backwards. > > The problem is when winsock operations are interrupted by APCs. > > > > See: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-04/msg00013.php > > WRT this bit: > > (1) carries a big problem - if we do this, we can *not* support SSL > > on win32, because it uses recv() and send() internally (inside the > > openssl library). Therefor, I don't think (1) is really an option - > > at least not in the long run. > > openssl does not have to use recv/send, that's what the BIO > infrastructure is for. The current backend code already constructs > BIOs for reading to support interrupting (see my_sock_read), so you > could replace the read with any functions you wanted.
Yes, it's on my TODO list to do just that. Unless this means you are volunteering to do it? ;) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
