On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 14:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think storage parameter is no good also, given the current design that > assumes those can be changed on-the-fly. It'd be okay to GIT-ify an > existing index, perhaps, but not the other way round. > > I was considering a new pg_index column. Or else we'd have to fix > the storage-parameter infrastructure to support restricting changes > of some parameters.
The latter seems best, since we're likely to need to do it anyway one day. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
