On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:56:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > AFAICS the only thing left that really needs to be discussed more during > this commit-fest is the business about whether it's sane to be trying to > apply selinux restrictions in simple_heap_update and friends.
I don't have any opinion about the patches, obviously, but I'm wondering whether there is, somewhere, an outline of what the _goals_ of this system are. If we have requirements that we can measure the implementation against, we can know whether to throw away a particular goal as being basically incompatible with the design of Postgres (i.e. not an "enhancement" but a "reconception") or else as being implementable with another approach. A -- Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
