"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about hacking together a simple patch tracker instead, as Bruce > suggested? > I've never found e-mail to be a particularly good way to track patches.
The thing is that we don't just want to "track" patches. We want to talk about patches. In my ideal world we would mail off our patches to -hackers and the mail software (this could be a subscription option) would strip them out before forwarding the message. It would upload them to a web server and put a link in the forwarded messages to the file on the web server. If you have a clever IMAP server and a clever IMAP client you're actually not far from that world today. But a lot of us are stuck with at least one unclever piece of software there. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
