David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Matthew T. O'connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Patches are an integral part of the conversation about > > > development, I think trying to split them up is awkward at best. > > > Do people really still think that the potential for larger > > > messages is really a problem? > > > > Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using > > -hackers. We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it > > seems worse. > > This would make it a little tougher on me as far as maintaining the > patches section of the PostgreSQL Weekly News, but I'll deal with it > if I need to :)
Yes, it is going to make scooping patches from the mailing list harder, but the existing split seems to be causing more widespread problems that are harder to ajust. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
