Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Andreas Pflug
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not the whole reason. To get a view definition that is more readable, the
pretty_bool option of pg_get_viewdef already does some newline and indent
formatting. Not the initial formatting, but Good Enough (TM), I believe.

This is where I disagree.  It really can make your sql quite
unreadable, adding all kinds of extra casts and parenthesis and such.
I am very particular about how my sql is formatted.

I agree to the disagreement ;-).
Reading and editing views is not the most pleasing thing to do currently. Still, storing the original SQL is not the right thing to do IMHO - the only viable option I can see is trying to store plain-text nodes with the parse tree which get reinserted when the parse tree is converted back into a query.

regards,
Florian Pflug


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to