James William Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but mainly I don't see the point.
> It's informative, no?
Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
