Is this a TODO item? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Smith wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative, > > too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints. > > I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate. > > I think it would be reasonable to only include the list of options used in > the dump if you use one that changes what appears in the dump. That way, > you wouldn't see anything by default. But if you make a modification that > will likely break a diff with an existing dump done with the default > parameters, the option change that introduced that should show at the very > beginning. > > -- > * Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
