On 7/2/08, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just in case anyone was unclear, this is how we're trying things for > this commitfest: > > 1) Starting RIGHT NOW, reviewers should claim review items they are > interested in or specially qualified to review. > > 2) This weekend, I will check for all items which don't have one or > more reviewers and parcel them out to the Round Robin Reviewers who > don't already have patches to review. > > You do not have to be a committer to be a reviewer. Anyone who knows C > > code and is familiar with PostgreSQL can be a reviewer. Heck, even > non-C coders can review proposed APIs. Each item can have several > reviewers, and probably should. > > Oh, also reviewers -- please try to use constructive criticism! Some > people are submitting their first patch, and we don't want them to > leave the project forever. Thanks!
I don't understand one aspect - if I'm unfamiliar with Postgres and cannot do full review or am familiar but cannot do full review due to time aspects but still want to throw some quick comments, should I register on wiki? And potentially make some actual reviewers to skip the patch? -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
