"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The comments should go to wiki? Not mailing list? > > It's a fine line (and slightly bendy line) - but simple comments can > go on the wiki, discussion should go to the list and be referenced > from the wiki. > > For example, see the 'returned for feedback' section at the end of the > last commit fest: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:2008-05
It is a fine line, but I think anything about the substance of the patch really ought to go to the list so other people get a chance to respond. IMHO the wiki is best thought of as a kind of group "todo list". Notes about the status of a patch and a bottom-line summary for future reference makes sense to keep there. Something like "review found problems with memory management" so we can reprioritize it without rereading the emails for every item. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
