"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The comments should go to wiki?  Not mailing list?
>
> It's a fine line (and slightly bendy line)  - but simple comments can
> go on the wiki, discussion should go to the list and be referenced
> from the wiki.
>
> For example, see the 'returned for feedback' section at the end of the
> last commit fest: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:2008-05

It is a fine line, but I think anything about the substance of the patch
really ought to go to the list so other people get a chance to respond.

IMHO the wiki is best thought of as a kind of group "todo list". Notes about
the status of a patch and a bottom-line summary for future reference makes
sense to keep there. Something like "review found problems with memory
management" so we can reprioritize it without rereading the emails for every
item.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to