On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > So it would seem that we need a way of handling temp tables that doesn't >> > rely on catalog entries at all. >> >> That's a complete non-starter; I need go no farther than to point out >> that it would break clients that expect to see their temp tables >> reflected in pg_class and so forth. > > What does the SQL Standard say about the Information Schema I wonder/
Many apps were written long before we had one. Not too mention that it doesn't provide anything like all the info that PostgreSQL-specific tool (though not necessarily user apps) would likely need. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers