Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Or we could have autovacuum just drop orphaned temp tables, *if*
they have gotten old enough to need anti-wraparound vacuuming.
While I'm still uncomfortable with having autovac drop anything,
at least this would avoid the worst cases of "gee I really needed
that data to investigate the crash". The main attractions of this
idea are avoiding the corrupt-index issue and not doing vacuuming
work that's 99.99% sure to be useless.
That sounds a lot simpler and better to me.
Yeah, when I read the original this one struck me as almost a no-brainer
choice.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
