Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend

[Peter Eisentraut]

Tom Lane writes:

> The alternative to pg_depend is to do a brute force scan of all the
> system catalogs looking for dependent objects.  In that case, you'd
> know what you are looking at, but if we extract the dependencies as
> a separate table, I don't see how you'd know without being told.

The former is what I'm advocating.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster