Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A point that I don't think has been made so far in the thread: the
>> only place the postmaster could complain in event of problems is the
>> postmaster log, which we know too well isn't watched by inexperienced
>> DBAs. I guarantee you that we will get bug reports along the lines of
>> "I updated pg_hba.conf and did pg_ctl reload, but nothing changed!
>> Postgres sucks!" if we implement checking at load time.
> How is this different from how we deal with postgresql.conf today?
It isn't, and I seem to recall we've had that scenario play out a couple
times already for postgresql.conf changes. But pg_hba.conf is far more
complex than "variable = value" ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
