* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > It isn't, and I seem to recall we've had that scenario play out a couple > > times already for postgresql.conf changes. But pg_hba.conf is far more > > complex than "variable = value" ... > > Ok, then I didn't misunderstand that part at least :-) > > Ah, well. I know that if others don't pipe in on my side of it, I'm > implicitly out-voted ;), since I've stated my case by now... Thus, I > won't put any time into working on it unless someone does.
Having one doesn't imply we don't have the other. I believe we should definitely have both the --check-config (to address Tom's concern, and to improve the user experience when doing an /etc/init.d/postgresql reload or similar) and the check done in the postmaster and have it only update the running config if the config file parsed correctly. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature