Heikki Linnakangas napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Similar is 32/64 bit compilation. It is handled on x86 by MAXALIGN but
MAXALIGN is same on SPARC for both binaries, but I'm not sure if it
works correctly.
Are 32/64-bit binaries on Sparc incompatible, then? Does our control
file check catch it? If not, what's causing it, and would the
--footprint switch catch it?
It is what I don't know. controlfile only says "incorrect checksum in control
file". It seems to me that CRC computing does not work correctly. I check
pg_control footprint and it is same for 32/64. It seems to me a false positive
complain, but ...
Footprint switch should help show you why it is incompatible and also protect
you during development to break some structure.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
