Simon Riggs wrote: > > What is the attraction of logical application of the WAL logs? > > Transmitting to a server with different architecture? > > Yes, > > * different release > * different encoding > * different CPU architecture > * (with the correct transform) a different DBMS > > So logical apply can provide a route for data transfer between > applications, not just replication for DR or HA. > > Physical apply works and will be more performant, but it will always be > more restrictive. So there are arguments for doing it both ways. > > I believe that we can and should offer both options to provide customer > choice. Ideally, it would be nice to be able to switch between the two > without significant reconfiguration, but that's definitely not for this > release.
I assume you are focusing on physical first, becuase that is easiest. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
