Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:52 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What is the attraction of logical application of the WAL logs?
>> Transmitting to a server with different architecture?
> Yes,
> * different release
> * different encoding
> * different CPU architecture
> * (with the correct transform) a different DBMS
The notion that the WAL logs will ever be portable across such
differences is so ... so ... well, it's barely worth laughing at.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
