"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I understand now why Oracle use => symbol for named params. This isn't
> used so operator - so implementation is trivial.
You really didn't understand the objection at all, did you?
The point is not about whether there is any built-in operator named =>.
The point is that people might have created user-defined operators named
that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
