On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 23:41 -0500, Decibel! wrote: > On Aug 20, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> How about we poll -general and see what people say? I'll bet Tom a > beer that no one replies saying they've created a => operator (unless > maybe PostGIS uses it). Does Oracle use => for "labeled function params" or just named arguments ? > If we're really worried about it we can have a GUC for a few versions > that turns off named parameter assignment. But I don't think we > should compromise the design on the theory that some folks might be > using that as an operator *and* can't change their application to > wrap it's use in (). I still think that better approach is allowing RECORD as input type and do all the things Pavel proposed with a function that iterates over record. -------------- Hannu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
