Tom Lane wrote:
We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no? It's been years since I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain yacc.
In my recollection, you were the last holdout on that with the occasional HP-UX yacc test. But I seem to recall that that combination actually no longer worked the last time.
If no one else has any interest in maintaining other-yacc support, then we might as well drop it.
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
