Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> BTW, there are at least two copies of that code to be changed. I'd >>> suggest grepping for assignments to t_hoff to be sure there aren't more. > >> I did send in a patch a while ago to get rid of the old HeapFormTuple() and >> friends. > > I remember discussing that idea, but I don't recall seeing an actual > patch? It would have to be quite large because of the number of places > using the old way. I'd also be a bit worried about breaking add-on > modules to little purpose ...
Huh, apparently I did it but didn't actually send in the patch: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00851.php I looked around and I don't seem to have it lying around any more. (Kind of mystifying since I have tons of old source trees and patches, just not that one.) I could do the janitorial work again if we're interested. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
