Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do we really have to make RECURSIVE a fully reserved keyword?
> According to the standard, RECURSIVE is a reserved keyword, I believe.
Sure, but our general rule is to make keywords no more reserved than
is absolutely necessary to make the bison grammar unambiguous. I
haven't tested, but I'm thinking that if WITH is fully reserved then
RECURSIVE shouldn't have to be.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
