Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, I'd been running into that issue too. Adding an explicit pointer > to the CTE into the RTE doesn't work because it renders the parse tree > un-copiable (at least without something a lot more sophisticated than > copyObject; and saving/loading rule parsetrees would be tough too).
Well the alternative to direct pointers is as you did with subqueries, turning the set into a flat array and storing indexes into the array. I'm not sure if that applies here or not. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers