On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:37 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:57:36 +0100 > "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has there been any idea to port PG to a more modern programming language > > > like C++? Of course there are some minor obstacles like a new OO design, > > > > The plan is to start porting it to Java after the next release - > > probably at the beginning of April. > > I don't think that we should rush into any one language without > checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything > to Intercal.
We should rewrite it to something that has no visual noise, so attracting new developers would be easier. My choice would be whitespace , see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) ----------------- Hannu Krosing -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
