On 9/21/08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Good point -- I'll look into that and post something tomorrow. How does > > "requirepassword" sound for the option? It is consistent with > > "requiressl" but a bit long and hard to read. Maybe "require_password"? > > > Well, no, because it's not requiring a password. > > Perhaps "ignore_pgpass"?
You need to ignore pg_service also. (And PGPASSWORD) -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
