Tom Lane wrote:
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 9/21/08, Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why? pg_service does not appear to support wildcards, so what is the attack
vector?
"service=foo host=custom"
The proposal to require a password = foo entry in the conn string seems
to resolve all of these, without taking away useful capability. I don't
think that forbidding use of services altogether is a good thing.
So that seems to tilt the decision towards exposing the conninfo_parse
function. Joe, do you want to have a go at it, or shall I?
Agreed. I'll take a stab at it.
Joe
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
