Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, why is that a bug?  If the platform is so silly as to define text
>> files that way, who are we to argue?

> The problem is that our pg_controldata might have binary values that
> contain 0x1a that will be confused by the operating system as
> end-of-file.

pg_controldata is certainly already being read as binary.  The
discussion here is about *text* files, particularly configuration
files.  Why should we not adhere to the platform standard about
what a text file is?

If you need a positive reason why this might be a bad idea, consider the
idea that someone is examining postgresql.conf with a text editor that
stops reading at control-Z.  He might not be able to see items that the
postmaster is treating as valid.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to