Robert Haas wrote: > > I think the answer is yes, because (as others have said) if we ever want > > to have SQL-level per-row permissions, then we can implement them with > > no change to the patch currently in discussion. > > If that's true, it weighs somewhat in favor of accepting this patch, > but how sure are we that it's really the case? If you only have one > implementation sitting on top of your abstraction layer, it's hard to > know whether you've implemented a general framework for doing X or > merely an interface that happens to suit the particular flavor of X > that you want to do today.
Yes, that is my point, and SE-Linux is just Linux, meaning it is OS-specific, making it even less generally useful. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
