Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Agreed, it can certainly be bettered. text[] seems to be the cleanest, >>> but then we still have the issue with wide output in psql, no? But >>> should we really design the view around the single use-case of psql? You >>> can still just omit that column from the SELECT if you want... >> Well, if we present as text[] then someone could easily use >> array_to_string to format the column the other way. So probably >> text[] is the right thing. > > Let's have it as text[] and have psql apply array_to_string() over it.
Eh, how can psql do this? You access the view with a simple SELECT * FROM pg_settings, no? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
