> > New TODO entries are:
> >
> > * Order duplicate index entries by tid
>
> In other words - add tid to index key: very old idea.
I was thinking during index creation, it would be nice to order them by
tid, but not do lots of work to keep it that way.
> > * Add queue of backends waiting for spinlock
>
> We shouldn't mix two different approaches for different
> kinds of short-time internal locks - in one cases we need in
> light lmgr (when we're going to keep lock long enough, eg for IO)
> and in another cases we'd better to proceed with POSIX' mutex-es
> or semaphores instead of spinlocks. Queueing backends waiting
> for spinlock sounds like nonsense - how are you going to protect
> such queue? With spinlocks? -:)
Yes, I guess so but hopefully we can spin waiting for the queue lock
rather than sleep. We could use POSIX spinlocks/semaphores now but we
don't because of performance, right?
Should we be spinning waiting for spinlock on multi-cpu machines? Is
that the answer?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
