On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not real sure why the code is inconsistent about spelling the > second field's name differently in some of the structs, but it seems > like a bad idea --- as you've demonstrated, it invites confusion. > What would probably be better is a patch to rename exprno, rfno, etc > to all be called dno to make this connection more obvious.
Attached. Passed regressions and basic testing. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
plpgsql_datumnaming_cleanup.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
