Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
> if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to
> be
> an advantage.
Other than whether it *works*, you mean?
make will not be happy if it has a dependency from preproc.c to preproc.y
and preproc.y is not there. Please don't mess with this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
