On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:57:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep > > preproc.y > > if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem > > to be > > an advantage. > > Other than whether it *works*, you mean? > > make will not be happy if it has a dependency from preproc.c to preproc.y > and preproc.y is not there. Please don't mess with this.
It doesn't complain but rebuild preproc.y which makes no sense at all. Removed preproc.y from make clean. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
