"Dmitry Koterov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you for a possible solution.
> But what about the database which exists and works correctly (and conforms
> all the standards from the documentation), but dump+restore sequence is
> failed for it? Does it mean that pg_dump should be improved to pass
> dump+restore sequence?
No matter what pg_dump does, it can never guarantee that a non-immutable
check constraint will still pass at restore time ... and that's
basically what you've got, if the check function is
search-path-sensitive.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
