Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I see your point but there's a pretty high standard for changing
>> existing behavior in bugfix releases.
> DISCARD ALL was specifically added in 8.3 for the purpose of
> connection poolers to be a "big hammer" that exactly emulates a new
> session. I'm somewhat skeptical that there are any applications using
> it directly at all, and doubly so that they would be using it and
> expecting advisory locks to persist.
The fact that it is new in 8.3 definitely weakens the backwards-
compatibility argument. I tend to agree that it's unlikely anyone is
really depending on this behavior yet. You could make a case that if we
don't backpatch now, we'd actually be *more* likely to create a problem,
because the longer that 8.3 is out with the current behavior, the more
likely that someone might actually come to depend on it.
On balance I'm for back-patching, but wanted to see what others thought.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
