>> I'm not sure what "mixed" mode is supposed to be, but based on what >> I've seen so far, I'm a skeptical of the idea that encouraging people >> to raise default_statistics_target to 50 and turn on >> constraint_exclusion is reasonable. > > Why?
Because both of those settings are strictly worse for my database than the defaults. I don't have any partitioned tables, and see: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg01837.php >> I'm also a bit surprised that >> there doesn't seem to be anything here that depends on the size of the >> database, even order-of-magnitude. It seems like the right value for >> checkpoint_segments, at least, might depend on that. > > What does checkpoint_segments have to do with the size of the database? It seems unlikely that you would want 256 MB of checkpoint segments on a database that is only 100 MB (or even 500 MB). But you might very well want that on a database that is 1 TB. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
