Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2008 22:38:29 James Mansion wrote:
Kurt Harriman wrote:
The foremost opposing argument seems to have been that there
should be no attempt to alleviate the existing reserved word
problem without automatic enforcement to guarantee that never
in the future can new occurrences be introduced.
Is there anything in the source that would necessarily preclude using the
C++ compiler to build *all* the code?
Probably lots, but that's not the problem we are trying to solve here. And
many people are seriously not interested in using C++ for PostgreSQL.
The most serious problem AFAIK is that we use setjmp/longjmp, which I
understand does not play at all nicely with C++ exceptions.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
