On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:04 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > They might care a lot about PITR
> > though, and that would be impossible if you lose the archive.
>
> Agreed, yes we need it as an option.
>
> > Do you see a cost to allowing all of the options listed by Fujii Masao?
>
> I haven't argued in favour of removing any options, so not sure what you
> mean. I have asked for an explanation of why certain features are needed
> so we can judge whether there is a simpler way of providing everything
> required. It may not exist.
I was trying to provide a use-case for maintaining the archive on both
primary and standby, i.e. option (1). My understanding was that you were
asking for such a use case with this question:
"So, why would you want to run with multiple archives?"
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
